[FEEDBACK] Inference Providers
Any inference provider you love, and that you'd like to be able to access directly from the Hub?
Love that I can call DeepSeek R1 directly from the Hub π₯
from huggingface_hub import InferenceClient
client = InferenceClient(
provider="together",
api_key="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
)
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What is the capital of France?"
}
]
completion = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1",
messages=messages,
max_tokens=500
)
print(completion.choices[0].message)
Is it possible to set a monthly payment budget or rate limits for all the external providers? I don't see such options in billings tab. In case a key is or session token is stolen, it can be quite dangerous to my thin wallet:(
@benhaotang you already get spending notifications when crossing important thresholds ($10, $100, $1,000) but we'll add spending limits in the future
@benhaotang you already get spending notifications when crossing important thresholds ($10, $100, $1,000) but we'll add spending limits in the future
Thanks for your quick reply, good to know!
Would be great if you could add Nebius AI Studio to the list :) New inference provider on the market, with the absolute cheapest prices and the highest rate limits...
Could be good to add featherless.ai
TitanML !!
Hi Hugging Face team,
Weβd like to register Bridge as an Inference Provider on the Hub.
Bridge operates cost-efficient OpenAI-compatible LLM inference infrastructure in Asia. Our initial integration would focus on Qwen3.8-27B.
Current production capability:
- OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions
- Streaming SSE
- Streaming and non-streaming usage reporting
- Tool/function calling and automatic tool selection
- Structured JSON outputs
- Authenticated HTTPS API
- Text-only inference
- 70K context / 8K max output
- $0.15/M input / $1.98/M output
- ~651 aggregate output tokens/sec verified at 16 concurrent requests
Website:
https://chyyx.github.io/Bridge-ai/
Privacy Policy:
https://chyyx.github.io/Bridge-ai/privacy.html
We have reviewed the Inference Provider registration guide and are ready to proceed with the huggingface.js integration and the Hugging Face-specific model mapping and billing requirements.
Proposed provider ID: bridge
Could you please confirm whether we should proceed with the huggingface.js PR now, and when you would like us to enable the required Hub organization plan for Model Mapping API access?
Thanks,
JC
Bridge
Hi Hugging Face team!
Weβd like to start the process of registering Netra Runtime as a Hugging Face Inference Provider.
- Name: Netra Runtime
- Proposed provider identifier:
netra - Website: https://netraruntime.com
- API base URL: https://api.netraruntime.com/v1
- API documentation: https://app.netraruntime.com/docs
- API reference: https://api.netraruntime.com/docs
- OpenAPI schema: https://api.netraruntime.com/openapi.yaml
- API compatibility: OpenAI-compatible
/v1/chat/completionsand/v1/models - Authentication: Bearer API keys
- Streaming: SSE streaming with
[DONE] - Request identification: Unique
X-Request-Idresponse header - Usage accounting: Input, cached-input, reasoning, and output-token usage
Netra Runtime provides optimized inference for open-weight models across AMD and NVIDIA GPUs. Our focus is high sustained throughput, competitive token pricing, and reliable OpenAI-compatible inference.
Our currently published model is:
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731- Uncached input: $0.20 per million tokens
- Cached input: $0.05 per million tokens
- Output: $0.50 per million tokens
- Supports streaming and configurable reasoning levels
Could you please confirm:
- Whether
netrais an acceptable provider identifier. - Whether onboarding can begin with chat completions, streaming, and reasoning while tool calling remains unsupported for the initial model.
- Which Hugging Face model mapping you would prefer for our initial DeepSeek route.
- Whether you would like us to open the
huggingface.jsprovider PR before server-side enablement. - The preferred private channel for reviewer credentials and future billing-endpoint credentials.
Once the expected capability scope and initial mapping are confirmed, we can prepare the client integration and remaining provider-specific billing work according to the registration guide.
Thank you!
Farrel
https://netraruntime.com
Hi Hugging Face team,
Following up on our Bridge provider introduction above. Could you advise whether we should proceed directly with a huggingface.js integration PR for the proposed provider ID bridge, or whether your team needs to review our provider eligibility first?
We would also appreciate guidance on the preferred private channel for sharing a test API key and any additional information needed for evaluation.
Our initial integration would focus on Qwen3.8-27B INT4, text-only. Weβre happy to follow your preferred onboarding sequence.
Thanks,
JC β Bridge
Hi β we'd like to be listed as an Inference Provider on the Hub.
Heabsy (FEYA s.r.o., Slovakia) serves open models on dedicated GPUs behind an OpenAI-compatible API. Three models today, all NVFP4 with the full 262k context:
| model | hardware | region | $/M in | $/M cached | $/M out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8-27B | RTX PRO 6000 (Blackwell) | Poland, EEA | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.20 |
| Qwen3.8-27B Uncensored | RTX PRO 6000 (Blackwell) | Poland, EEA | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.90 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash-Next (125B MoE, 6B active, text + image in) | B200 | Ashburn, VA | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.45 |
Inference is zero-retention: prompts and completions are never written to storage β the response cache is switched off in our gateway precisely so that claim is literally true, and we can demonstrate it on our production database rather than just assert it in a policy.
On the prerequisites in the registration guide: our API is strictly OpenAI-compatible, SSE streaming carries usage with the cached-token split, tool calling and JSON-schema structured output both work, reasoning is returned in a separate field, and every response β streaming included β already carries a unique per-request id header, so billing reconciliation has something to key on. Public machine-readable catalogue: https://api.heabsy.com/openrouter/v1/models
We're ready to open the huggingface.js PR and stand up the billing endpoint described in the guide. Two questions before we start: who should we coordinate with, and is there anything you'd want to see first? Happy to hand over a test key.
Konstantin Fomichev β Heabsy / FEYA s.r.o.
Hi Hugging Face team (cc @julien-c @Wauplin @SBrandeis @hanouticelina)
We'd like to register SolarGPU as an Inference Provider on the Hub.
- Name: SolarGPU, proposed provider id
solargpu - Hub account: https://huggingface.co/solargpu (organization with Team plan to follow at step 3)
- Website: https://solargpu.es Β· privacy & retention: https://solargpu.es/privacidad Β· terms: https://solargpu.es/terminos-api
- Who we are: a Spanish company (Acceleration Robotics S.L.U.) running solar-powered GPU nodes in Spain. We serve open-weight models from our own NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB) cards β one dedicated today, expandable to five across two nodes (480 GB VRAM) β with EU data residency and zero data retention (prompts and completions are not stored; billing metadata only; no training on customer data).
- API: OpenAI-compatible
/v1/chat/completionswith streaming,usageon every response, tool calling and structured outputs; served with vLLM 0.29 behind a LiteLLM gateway. Hub traffic would enter athttps://api.solargpu.es/v1(live;https://api.solargpu.es/modelspublishes the catalogue with pricing and context length). - Initial mapping,
conversational:openai/gpt-oss-120bβgpt-oss-120b,Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3Bβqwen3.6-35b-a3b,nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16βnemotron-3-super-120b(nvfp4),NousResearch/Hermes-4-70Bβhermes-4-70b(fp8); proposed instaging. On the full node we can adddeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731andzai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash. - Pricing: we keep our list prices at or below the current floor for these models (USD per M tokens, input / output): gpt-oss-120b 0.03 / 0.17, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 0.05 / 0.70, Nemotron 3 Super 0.08 / 0.38, Hermes 4 70B 0.12 / 0.38.
/v1/modelswill exposepricingandcontext_lengthas required. - Ready on our side, per the register-as-a-provider guide:
- Task API OpenAI-compatible; TTFT well under 5 s at our concurrency; tool calling and structured output supported (vLLM).
- Billing endpoint to your spec (cost in nano-USD, polled per minute) β implemented with the test endpoint; URL and auth to follow privately.
huggingface.jsprovider helper β pull request to follow once you confirm the id.
- Timeline: the endpoint is live now; a test key for your validation suite on request; 1 GPU dedicated at launch, up to 5 on demand.
Why us: most floor-price endpoints for open-weight models are outside the EU. We offer EU residency with zero retention at floor prices, from solar-powered hardware in Spain.
Happy to share a test key so your team can run the validation suite against the endpoint, and to discuss the Team plan for the org as part of step 3.
Thanks!
SolarGPU team
Org: Least-gen (leastgen), Team, want provider "leastgen" for Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B, api.leastgen.com OpenAI-compatible, contact khalid@leastgen.com,
Hi Hugging Face team β following up on our September 1 application with a production update for IteraCompute (cc @julien-c @Wauplin @SBrandeis @hanouticelina).
Our dedicated Hugging Face compatibility gateway is now live:
- Base URL: https://api.iteracompute.com/hf
- Model catalogue: https://api.iteracompute.com/hf/v1/models
- Readiness: https://api.iteracompute.com/hf/health/ready
- Chat Completions: POST https://api.iteracompute.com/hf/v1/chat/completions
- Billing: POST https://api.iteracompute.com/hf/v1/billing (credentials available privately)
The initial HF onboarding catalogue remains:
- Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B β 327,680 context; $0.30/M input, $2.50/M output
- ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B β 327,680 context; $0.30/M input, $3.00/M output
Both initial routes have passed non-streaming, streaming, tool-calling, strict JSON-schema output, Inference-Id, and billing acceptance. Billing validation included idempotent per-request settlement, pending-request handling, a 10,000-ID batch, and exact nano-USD price reconciliation.
Our broader production catalogue has also expanded to nine ready models. In addition to the two initial routes, the following are available as candidates for staging model mappings after onboarding:
| Hugging Face model | Context | Input / 1M | Cached input / 1M | Output / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash | 1,048,576 | $0.12 | $0.02 | $0.48 |
| deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | 970,000 | $0.35 | $0.03 | $1.30 |
| deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | 1,048,576 | $1.10 | $0.11 | $3.50 |
| MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 | 1,048,576 | $0.40 | $0.08 | $1.60 |
| moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | 1,048,576 | $3.10 | $0.31 | $15.50 |
| Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | 970,000 | $1.95 | $0.20 | $5.95 |
| zai-org/GLM-5.3 | 1,048,576 | $1.50 | $0.23 | $6.20 |
The public machine-readable catalogue with per-model capabilities is available at https://api.iteracompute.com/v1/models.
Client integration status:
- huggingface.js PR: https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface.js/pull/2440 β open; its fork workflows are awaiting maintainer approval to run.
- huggingface_hub coordination issue: https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/issues/4795
- huggingface_hub Draft PR: https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/pull/4794 β automatically closed pending maintainer agreement in the issue, as required by that repository's contribution process.
Could you please confirm the provider identifier iteracompute, advise which models you would prefer in the initial mapping set, and enable the IteraCompute organization for provider onboarding and the Model Mapping API when appropriate? We are ready to activate the required organization plan at that step and can provide rotated test and billing credentials privately.
Thank you,
IteraCompute
Hi Hugging Face team,
we are preparing SovSales Inference, an independent OpenAI-compatible inference provider for open-weight models.
Our provider gateway implements OpenAI-compatible chat completions, streaming, token usage reporting, model metadata, bearer authentication, request IDs, rate limiting and a published privacy/data policy. Production GPU-backed serving is currently being staged and will be validated before any model is marked live.
Provider profile:
https://sovereignsalesswarm.de/inference/
API base:
https://sovereignsalesswarm.de/api/inference/v1
Models:
https://sovereignsalesswarm.de/api/inference/v1/models
We would like to integrate SovSales as a Hugging Face Inference Provider. Could you enable our organization for the provider integration process and confirm the next onboarding steps, including the Team or Enterprise requirement?
Organization:
https://huggingface.co/sovsales
Best,
SovSales Inference
info@sovereignsalesswarm.de