qqqqaXCN PRO
xcnqa009
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
repliedto robtacconelli's post about 9 hours ago
๐งฉ Ever dreamed of parallel programming in a few clicks? Tolquane: draw a Python pipeline in your browser, run it on threads, processes or a cluster - and it never hangs
What if high-performance computing started with placing blocks - and the result stayed plain Python you can run anywhere?
Tolquane is a library of composable building blocks (nodes, pipelines, farms, all-to-all, feedback loops) with a web editor on top. One graph, four runtimes: threads, child processes, coroutines, TCP across machines. Every channel is bounded, every deadlock is reported by name, every error cancels the run.
What's inside
- Tolquane Web: a canvas that writes the Python file, and a code editor that redraws the canvas. Run a flow and watch items, queue depth and busy time on every stage; tap any edge to see what flows through it.
- AI builder: describe the flow in one sentence; it writes, checks, runs and improves it, you apply the diff.
- Schedules with cron presets, webhooks, mail and retries. Git history of every flow. Users and roles.
- `tq.optimize` fuses stages into farm ends and cuts threads; `tolquane launch` starts every host from one deploy file.
Numbers: 5.5ร on 8 workers for CPU-bound Python (processes runtime), 5.6ร on free-threaded 3.14t, 1M items over TCP in 3.5 s.
๐ Try it now, nothing to install (sign in as demo / tolquane): https://huggingface.co/spaces/robtacconelli/tolquane
๐ป Code: https://github.com/robtacconelli/Tolquane
๐ฆ pip install "tolquane[web]" && tolquane web
๐ Docs: https://robtacconelli.github.io/Tolquane/
Apache-2.0, Python 3.11+, no dependencies for the library itself. Try it, break it, tell me what you'd build with it - โญ appreciated! repliedto mihailgribov's post about 9 hours ago
How often can an email make your AI agent move money?
We gave the agent one job: log an incoming email. But the emails carried an indirect prompt injection - a second instruction, written for the agent rather than for a person: make a payment.
Across nine agentic models, the same injected emails produced payment orders in **0% to 42%** of cases. All nine ran under the same conditions - one agent, one set of tools, the same 395 emails - so the numbers compare directly.
And the average score hides the interesting part: different models fail on different kinds of injections.
Full experiment and results:
https://huggingface.co/blog/mihailgribov/agentic-models-measured-on-the-injections-that-mov
The bench is public too - run your own model through the same test:
https://github.com/mihail-gribov/quadrat-ipi-model-eval
https://huggingface.co/datasets/mihailgribov/quadrat-ipi
#prompt-injection #indirect-prompt-injection #agentic-ai #llm-security #ai-agentsOrganizations
None yet